{ "schema": "spiralist.international-api-discovery.v1", "coverage": { "records": 250, "isoRecords": 249, "supplementalRecords": 1, "unMemberStates": 193, "unObserverStates": 2, "otherIsoCountryOrAreaRecords": 54, "fullSuppliedReports": 11, "baselineRecords": 239, "regionalResearchLenses": 10, "regionalContextRecords": 232, "standaloneResearchSources": 34, "researchWaves": 8 }, "researchCorpus": { "allSources": 40, "countryReports": 11, "regionalReports": 8, "mechanicsReports": 7, "methodologyAndPromptReports": 2, "crossCuttingReports": 2, "foundationalReports": 4, "exactPublicSources": 13, "curatedPublicSummaries": 27, "reportsZipPackaged": false, "researchAgentReports": 6 }, "regionalResearch": { "lenses": 10, "regionalLenses": 8, "crossCuttingLenses": 2, "recordsWithRegionalContext": 232 }, "researchQueue": { "records": 250, "countrySpecificReports": 11, "regionalContextPendingCountryResearch": 224, "globalBaselineAndRegionalGap": 15, "researchWaves": 8, "waveRegionCounts": { "7": { "Asia": 3, "Oceania": 3, "Europe": 6, "Africa": 12, "Americas": 5 }, "3": { "Europe": 7, "Americas": 4, "Africa": 6, "Oceania": 3, "Asia": 2 }, "5": { "Africa": 8, "Americas": 3, "Antarctica": 1, "Europe": 7, "Oceania": 4, "Asia": 2 }, "1": { "Oceania": 4, "Americas": 7, "Asia": 6, "Africa": 4, "Europe": 5 }, "6": { "Europe": 7, "Americas": 7, "Africa": 9, "Oceania": 3, "Asia": 7, "Antarctica": 1 }, "8": { "Africa": 7, "Americas": 10, "Europe": 6, "Asia": 11, "Oceania": 6 }, "4": { "Antarctica": 1, "Americas": 11, "Asia": 7, "Europe": 4, "Africa": 6, "Oceania": 5 }, "2": { "Africa": 7, "Americas": 8, "Antarctica": 1, "Asia": 5, "Europe": 8 }, "0": { "Asia": 7, "Europe": 3, "Americas": 1 } }, "priorityRule": "Equal research dignity through regional rotation and explicit small-state/territory inclusion; no threat, wealth, power, language, or media-attention score." }, "mechanics": { "schema": "spiralist.international-intelligence-mechanics.v1", "release": "v100.0.13-international-research-integration-wip", "generatedAtUtc": "2026-07-20T23:30:00Z", "fairnessContract": "global-country-context-fairness-v1", "fairnessContractVersion": "1.1.0", "mode": "equal-questions-distinct-contexts-evidence-layers-balanced-research", "neutralityRules": [ "Compare institutions, authorities, evidence, incentives, and consequences rather than assigning national moral rankings.", "Operational success is not moral legitimacy; public transparency is not proof of weakness; opacity is not proof of competence.", "Do not use protected traits, diagnosis, nationality, religion, ethnicity, language, or diaspora status as suspicion scores.", "Keep access, opportunity, motive, behavior, corroboration, authorization, and adjudication separate." ], "phases": [ { "id": "direction-tasking", "label": "Direction and tasking", "focus": [ "vague requirements", "competing priorities", "scarcity", "politicization", "requirements overtaken by events" ] }, { "id": "collection-access", "label": "Collection and lawful access", "focus": [ "source suitability", "authorization", "necessity and proportionality", "coverage gaps", "collection bias", "non-operational abstraction" ] }, { "id": "processing-provenance", "label": "Processing and provenance", "focus": [ "authentication", "translation", "entity resolution", "circular reporting", "correction propagation" ] }, { "id": "analysis-uncertainty", "label": "Analysis and uncertainty", "focus": [ "fact versus assumption", "competing hypotheses", "probability versus confidence", "dissent", "deception" ] }, { "id": "dissemination-decision", "label": "Dissemination and decision support", "focus": [ "audience fit", "classification", "caveat preservation", "urgent warnings", "policy responsibility" ] }, { "id": "counterintelligence-due-process", "label": "Counterintelligence and due process", "focus": [ "anomaly versus proof", "access is not guilt", "independent review", "appeal", "exoneration and remediation" ] }, { "id": "review-learning", "label": "Review, correction, and institutional learning", "focus": [ "outcome review", "false-positive repair", "source protection review", "bias audit", "correction propagation", "requirements feedback" ] } ], "sourceReports": [ { "id": "mechanics-counterintelligence", "domain": "counterintelligence", "title": "The Architecture of Secrecy: A Comparative Study of Counterintelligence, Insider Risk, and Institutional Resilience", "summary": "Evidence thresholds, anomaly-versus-proof, competing hypotheses, insider-risk safeguards, appeal, exoneration, remediation, and institutional resilience.", "sourceFilename": "counterintelligence-institutional-resilience.md", "originalUploadedFilename": "Counterintelligence Game Mechanics Research(3).md", "sha256": "ce53f7a8670d3279d882c92c257f120dec4a3418536ca8555e2834d76fedcee6", "bytes": 59478, "headings": [ "The Architecture of Secrecy: A Comparative Study of Counterintelligence, Insider Risk, and Institutional Resilience", "Part I: The Epistemology of Threat Detection", "Differentiating Anomalies from Hostile Activity", "The Counterintelligence Lifecycle", "Evaluating Access, Opportunity, Motive, and Proof", "Part II: Modeling Insider Risk and Human Factors", "The Critical Path Insider-Risk Model", "Mental-Health and Human-Factors Safeguards", "Part III: Organizational Dynamics, Deception, and Institutional Paranoia", "False Accusations and Contaminated Evidence", "Strategic Deception and Fabricated Leads", "Part IV: Damage Assessment, Recovery, and Institutional Learning", "Post-Compromise Damage Assessment", "Exploiting the Compromise", "Security Reforms and Unintended Consequences", "Part V: Comparative Historical Case Studies", "Part VI: Neutrality, Bias Audit, and the Asymmetry of Historical Record", "Part VII: Translation into Game Mechanics", "Core Safeguards and Behavioral Boundaries", "Mechanic 1-6: Detection and Evidentiary Evaluation", "Mechanic 7-12: Investigation, Consequence, and Deception", "Mechanic 13-18: Post-Compromise, Remediation, and Reform", "Final Recommendations", "Works cited" ], "publicSourcePath": "/docs/international-research-v100.0.13/mechanics/counterintelligence-institutional-resilience.md", "publishedSummaryPath": "/docs/international-research-v100.0.13/mechanics/counterintelligence-institutional-resilience.md", "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true }, { "id": "mechanics-dissemination", "domain": "dissemination", "title": "Intelligence Dissemination, Decision Support, and Consequences", "summary": "Audience-specific products, warning urgency, probability and confidence, caveat preservation, classification, correction, and policy responsibility.", "sourceFilename": "intelligence-dissemination-decision-support.md", "originalUploadedFilename": "Intelligence Dissemination Game Mechanics(3).md", "sha256": "fd38ec138a5be26d086505059f1a3f8a558e24a5b5e7e0917cc4a053b83835a2", "bytes": 63033, "headings": [ "Intelligence Dissemination, Decision Support, and Consequences", "Taxonomy of Intelligence Products and Audiences", "The Medium of Dissemination: Written, Oral, Visual, Interactive, and Automated", "Classification, Compartmentation, and Downstream Utility", "Theoretical Models of Intelligence Mechanics", "Model for Warning Urgency, Impact, Probability, and Confidence", "Communicating Probability: The WEP Model", "Preserving Caveats Through Summaries", "Corrections, Retractions, and Updated Judgments", "Path from Analyst Judgment to Decision: The Separation Model", "Historical Case Studies", "Game Systems Translation: Mechanics of Intelligence and Decision", "Works cited" ], "publicSourcePath": "/docs/international-research-v100.0.13/mechanics/intelligence-dissemination-decision-support.md", "publishedSummaryPath": "/docs/international-research-v100.0.13/mechanics/intelligence-dissemination-decision-support.md", "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true }, { "id": "mechanics-processing", "domain": "processing", "title": "Processing, Authentication, Provenance, and Evidence Integrity: A Systemic Framework for Wargame Simulation", "summary": "Authentication, translation, provenance, entity resolution, circular reporting, immutable correction, backlogs, and evidence integrity.", "sourceFilename": "intelligence-processing-provenance.md", "originalUploadedFilename": "Intelligence Processing Game Mechanics(3).md", "sha256": "6c95583e0b88bd89eb4655b7a2906971ed7fc64067cedab6e8418299ffa6527d", "bytes": 73305, "headings": [ "Processing, Authentication, Provenance, and Evidence Integrity: A Systemic Framework for Wargame Simulation", "Comparative Scope and Bureaucratic Contexts", "Distinguishing Evidence Attributes", "The Evidence Lifecycle and Provenance", "Complete Evidence-Lifecycle Model", "Provenance Data Model for Game Implementation", "Confidence Ratings and Source-Quality", "Taxonomy of Processing Errors", "Human Processing Risks", "Automated Processing Risks", "Methodologies for Processing Integrity", "Checklist for Determining Genuine Independence", "Model for Recording Translations and Alternate Interpretations", "Model for Corrections and Audit History", "Historical Case Studies in Processing Failures", "Translation into Game Mechanics", "Evidence Objects with Visible Provenance Chains", "Original Records and Derivative Summaries", "Conflicting Translations", "Incomplete Metadata", "Time Pressure Creating Processing Backlogs", "Players Choosing Which Records Receive Priority", "Duplicate Reports that Appear Independent", "Compartment Restrictions", "Source-Protection Redactions", "Machine-Generated Entity Matches Requiring Review", "Evidence Contamination Caused by Improper Questioning", "Tamper Indicators That Establish Concern But Not Guilt", "Different Players Processing Complementary Parts of a Case", "Rewards for Preserving Uncertainty (Penalties for False Certainty)", "Audit and Appeal Systems for Consequential Evidence Decisions", "Conclusion", "Works cited" ], "publicSourcePath": "/docs/international-research-v100.0.13/mechanics/intelligence-processing-provenance.md", "publishedSummaryPath": "/docs/international-research-v100.0.13/mechanics/intelligence-processing-provenance.md", "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true }, { "id": "mechanics-analysis", "domain": "analysis", "title": "Intelligence Analysis, Competing Hypotheses, and Uncertainty: A Comparative Study and Systems Architecture", "summary": "Fact, assumption, inference, speculation, competing hypotheses, probability, confidence, dissent, deception, and hindsight controls.", "sourceFilename": "intelligence-analysis-uncertainty.md", "originalUploadedFilename": "Intelligence Analysis Game Mechanics(3).md", "sha256": "069df63ac0ab3594b0e0922133900c62ada3a6753ddf717d51b9c83ea0a593e7", "bytes": 59424, "headings": [ "Intelligence Analysis, Competing Hypotheses, and Uncertainty: A Comparative Study and Systems Architecture", "The Epistemology of Intelligence: A Taxonomy of Judgments", "The Architecture of Uncertainty: Probability, Confidence, and Source Evaluation", "Competing Hypotheses and the Evaluation of Evidence", "Cognitive Biases, Institutional Culture, and Minority Dissent", "Assessing the Adversary: Capability, Intent, and Deception", "Retrospective Evaluation and the Control of Hindsight Bias", "Comparative Case Studies in Intelligence Analysis", "Translation into Game Mechanics: Simulating Intelligence Architecture", "Evidence Boards (Separating Observations from Interpretations)", "ACH Matrix (Competing Explanations & Disconfirming Evidence)", "Probability and Confidence Sliders (Expressing Uncertainty)", "Assumption Registers (Identifying Assumptions)", "Dissent Notes (Recording Dissent)", "Admiralty Code Validator (Assessing Source Independence)", "Gap-Driven Collection (Collection Requests)", "The \"Dog That Didn't Bark\" (Handling Absence of Evidence)", "Reflexive Control Injector (Recognizing Deception)", "Time vs. Depth Engine (Time Pressure Affecting Depth)", "The C-I-O-A-A Matrix (Distinguishing Capability, Intent, Action)", "Leader Tolerance Profiles (Decision-Maker Uncertainty)", "Irreversible Action Threshold (Corroboration & Review)", "Appeal and Reassessment (Updating Judgments)", "Hindsight-Controlled Scoring (Retrospective Evaluation)", "Works cited" ], "publicSourcePath": "/docs/international-research-v100.0.13/mechanics/intelligence-analysis-uncertainty.md", "publishedSummaryPath": "/docs/international-research-v100.0.13/mechanics/intelligence-analysis-uncertainty.md", "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true }, { "id": "mechanics-tasking", "domain": "tasking", "title": "Intelligence Direction, Requirements, and Political Tasking: A Comparative Institutional Analysis and Game Design Translation", "summary": "Political requirements, scarcity, vague directives, conflicting priorities, politicization, feedback, opportunity costs, and mission obsolescence.", "sourceFilename": "intelligence-tasking-game-design.md", "originalUploadedFilename": "Intelligence Tasking Game Design(3).md", "sha256": "f8ad8f76167dd95c3dcf52e016af01e525c6c3817f05f9732e830b1a99a693f3", "bytes": 60630, "headings": [ "Intelligence Direction, Requirements, and Political Tasking: A Comparative Institutional Analysis and Game Design Translation", "The Comparative Institutional Landscape", "Taxonomy of Intelligence Requirements", "The Lifecycle of an Intelligence Requirement", "Authorization, Influence, and Translation", "Scarcity, Prioritization, and Crisis Adaptation", "Contradictions, Vague Directives, and Overload", "Politicization, Pressure, and Institutional Safeguards", "Feedback Loops, Unanswered Questions, and Abandonment", "Ten Historically Grounded Examples of Intelligence Requirements", "Recurring Organizational Tensions", "Universal Institutional Pressures", "Country-Specific Practices", "Translation into Game Mechanics", "Neutrality and Bias Audit", "Bibliography", "Works cited" ], "publicSourcePath": "/docs/international-research-v100.0.13/mechanics/intelligence-tasking-game-design.md", "publishedSummaryPath": "/docs/international-research-v100.0.13/mechanics/intelligence-tasking-game-design.md", "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true }, { "id": "mechanics-direction-comparative", "domain": "comparative-direction", "title": "The Contested Bureaucracy: A Comparative Analysis of Intelligence Direction and Institutional Tasking", "summary": "Comparative institutional tasking systems and nonpartisan game translation across different constitutional and political arrangements.", "sourceFilename": "intelligence-direction-comparative.md", "originalUploadedFilename": "Intelligence Game Mechanics Research(3).md", "sha256": "469a5c6b3c01e0d896af5b3b503013b2abae62102cb28712ebfcc605e64e857c", "bytes": 53171, "headings": [ "The Contested Bureaucracy: A Comparative Analysis of Intelligence Direction and Institutional Tasking", "Executive Summary and Confidence Assessment", "Comparative Institutional Map: Political Authority to Intelligence Action", "The Bureaucratic Battlefield: Translating Priorities into Action", "Taxonomy of Intelligence Requirements", "Ten Historically Grounded Examples of Intelligence Requirements", "Organizational Tensions: Universal Pressures vs. Country-Specific Practices", "Translation into Game Mechanics", "Neutrality and Bias Audit", "Categorized Source Assessment", "Works cited" ], "publicSourcePath": "/docs/international-research-v100.0.13/mechanics/intelligence-direction-comparative.md", "publishedSummaryPath": "/docs/international-research-v100.0.13/mechanics/intelligence-direction-comparative.md", "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true }, { "id": "mechanics-complete-cycle", "domain": "complete-cycle", "title": "Comparative Intelligence Cycle Architecture and Fictional Mission-Mechanics Translation", "summary": "An integrated, non-operational intelligence-cycle architecture connecting direction, lawful collection, processing, analysis, dissemination, counterintelligence, review, and correction.", "sourceFilename": "intelligence-cycle-game-mechanics.md", "originalUploadedFilename": "Intelligence Cycle Game Mechanics.md", "sha256": "3d7ec316be68f8fffd29d2bb050e2f5435d7aee7697e4b8e7ed55f0dcd2e0759", "bytes": 80185, "headings": [ "Comparative Intelligence Cycle Architecture and Fictional Mission-Mechanics Translation", "Title and Exact UTC Research Cutoff", "Executive Summary", "Research Questions and Scope", "Limitations and Source-Access Constraints", "Methodology, Source Hierarchy, and Confidence Framework", "Current-Status Audit with Verification Dates", "Historical Evolution and Major Reforms", "Constitutional, Legal, Political, and Administrative Setting", "Formal Authority Chart", "Assessed Practical Coordination Chart", "Complete Institutional Map", "Detailed Profiles of Every Principal Institution", "Distinction Among Intelligence Disciplines", "Direction and Tasking Model", "Collection and Reporting Model at a Non-Operational Level", "Processing, Translation, Authentication, and Provenance Model", "Analysis, Competing Hypotheses, and Confidence Model", "Dissemination, Warning, Releasability, and Correction Model", "Counterintelligence, Insider-Risk, and Remediation Model", "Cyber, Technical, Financial, and Economic-Intelligence Structure", "International Liaison and Information-Sharing Relationships", "Oversight, Courts, Legislatures, and Accountability Debates", "Institutional Strengths, Tradeoffs, Bottlenecks, and Failure Modes", "Disputed, Opaque, Low-Confidence, and Unknown Areas", "Common Myths and Evidence-Based Corrections", "Fair Fictional Game-Design Translation", "Core Mechanical Architecture", "State Diagrams & Event Taxonomies", "Failure Modes and Consequence States", "Six Fictional Mission Examples", "Safety and Representation Guardrails", "Research Gaps, Correction Path, and Freshness Plan", "Conclusion", "REQUIRED TABLES AND APPENDICES", "Formal-Versus-Practical Authority Table", "Domestic-Versus-Foreign Jurisdiction Table", "Civilian, Military, Police, Financial, Cyber, Border, Diplomatic Matrix", "Oversight and Accountability Matrix", "International-Liaison Matrix", "Confidence-Rated Claims Register", "Source Register (Categorized)", "Terminology and Native-Name Glossary", "Freshness Register", "Research-Gap Register", "Machine-Readable Summary", "Full Bibliography", "Works cited" ], "publicSourcePath": "/docs/international-research-v100.0.13/mechanics/intelligence-cycle-game-mechanics.md", "publishedSummaryPath": "/docs/international-research-v100.0.13/mechanics/intelligence-cycle-game-mechanics.md", "fullSourcePubliclyServed": true } ], "operationalBoundary": "Abstract institutional and game-design education only; no actionable intrusion, surveillance evasion, coercion, sabotage, weapons, concealment, or violence instructions.", "corpusExpansion": { "completeCycleSourceAdded": true, "sourceCount": 7, "regionalTranslationRule": "Universal mechanics may be shared; national institutions, law, oversight, and consequences remain source-specific." } }, "scope": "Worldwide country and area context, regional and cross-cutting research, evidence literacy, fair institutional comparison, character identity grounding, and abstract game-system design.", "methodology": { "contract": "global-country-context-fairness-v1", "release": "v100.0.19-economy-housing-source-review-wip", "version": "1.1.0", "mode": "equal-questions-distinct-contexts-evidence-layers-balanced-research", "coverage": { "records": 250, "isoRecords": 249, "supplementalRecords": 1, "unMemberStates": 193, "unObserverStates": 2, "otherIsoCountryOrAreaRecords": 54, "fullSuppliedReports": 11, "baselineRecords": 239, "regionalResearchLenses": 10, "regionalContextRecords": 232, "standaloneResearchSources": 34, "researchWaves": 8 }, "fairnessPrinciples": [ "Apply the same research questions everywhere while preserving real institutional differences.", "Country, government, intelligence service, military, police, religion, population, diaspora, and individual are separate analytical units.", "Do not reward geopolitical prominence, military power, English-language source abundance, population size, or perceived threat with automatic research priority.", "Do not punish opacity with invented claims or reward transparency with a presumption of weakness.", "Use local terminology and local-language or regional scholarship where practicable, and disclose when source access is limited.", "Keep official structure, practical influence, independent confirmation, assessment, allegation, dispute, and unknown visibly separate.", "Treat oversight, due process, appeal, correction, exoneration, civil liberties, and human rights as part of institutional analysis rather than optional commentary.", "Regional context may frame research questions but cannot substitute for country-specific evidence.", "Small states, microstates, territories, observer states, recognition-variable jurisdictions, and states without conventional intelligence services receive equal analytical dignity.", "International liaison is not proof of subordination, and repeated reporting is not independent corroboration unless provenance is genuinely separate.", "Protected traits, names, languages, diagnoses, religions, residence, nationality, migration, or community affiliation never become suspicion, loyalty, competence, morality, politics, or behavior scores." ], "researchChecklist": [ "constitutional and legal basis", "formal institutional structure", "assessed practical authority and coordination", "foreign intelligence", "domestic security and counterintelligence", "military and service intelligence", "police, criminal-investigation, border, maritime, financial, cyber, and technical functions", "direction, lawful collection, processing, analysis, dissemination, feedback, and correction", "oversight, courts, legislatures, inspectors, auditors, media, civil society, remedies, and rights concerns", "international liaison, external dependence, and source-control rules", "official position, independent evidence, assessment, allegation, dispute, and unknown", "state-versus-population, religion-versus-militancy, diaspora, migration, language, and protected-trait audit", "current-status freshness and correction path", "non-actionable fictional game translation" ], "evidenceLayers": [ "official structure", "official state position", "independent confirmation", "assessment", "allegation", "dispute", "unknown" ], "mechanicPhases": [ { "id": "direction-tasking", "label": "Direction and tasking", "focus": [ "vague requirements", "competing priorities", "scarcity", "politicization", "requirements overtaken by events" ] }, { "id": "collection-access", "label": "Collection and lawful access", "focus": [ "source suitability", "authorization", "necessity and proportionality", "coverage gaps", "collection bias", "non-operational abstraction" ] }, { "id": "processing-provenance", "label": "Processing and provenance", "focus": [ "authentication", "translation", "entity resolution", "circular reporting", "correction propagation" ] }, { "id": "analysis-uncertainty", "label": "Analysis and uncertainty", "focus": [ "fact versus assumption", "competing hypotheses", "probability versus confidence", "dissent", "deception" ] }, { "id": "dissemination-decision", "label": "Dissemination and decision support", "focus": [ "audience fit", "classification", "caveat preservation", "urgent warnings", "policy responsibility" ] }, { "id": "counterintelligence-due-process", "label": "Counterintelligence and due process", "focus": [ "anomaly versus proof", "access is not guilt", "independent review", "appeal", "exoneration and remediation" ] }, { "id": "review-learning", "label": "Review, correction, and institutional learning", "focus": [ "outcome review", "false-positive repair", "source protection review", "bias audit", "correction propagation", "requirements feedback" ] } ], "languageContext": { "summary": { "countryOrAreaRecords": 250, "languageRecords": 1515, "cldrBackedRecords": 249, "fallbackRecords": 0, "supplementalRecords": 1 }, "source": { "package": "Babel", "packageVersion": "2.18.0", "upstream": "Unicode Common Locale Data Repository (CLDR) territory language data", "displayNameSupplement": "pycountry ISO 639 names when the English CLDR display-name table lacks a code", "licenseNote": "Generated metadata snapshot; language estimates are context, not individual identity probabilities." }, "boundaries": [ "Territory-level language data is descriptive context and may be incomplete, dated, or non-additive.", "Population percentages never determine an individual character’s native language, ethnicity, citizenship, politics, religion, or behavior.", "Official status does not mean every resident speaks a language, and absence does not mean a language is unimportant.", "A generated character language becomes a fictional biography fact only when the generator explicitly selects and records it with provenance." ] }, "identitySeparation": { "countryOrAreaCode": "Catalog and routing identifier only; it does not establish citizenship or sovereignty.", "citizenships": "Legal citizenships are explicit profile facts and may contain more than one value.", "legalNationality": "A legal status field, not a complete cultural identity.", "nationalIdentity": "Self-described identity may differ from citizenship, birthplace, or residence.", "birthplaceAndPlacesRaised": "Life-history fields that require their own chronology.", "residenceAndResidencyStatus": "Current place and legal status are separate from nationality.", "familyOriginsAndMigrationEvents": "Causal bridges must be profile-established rather than inferred.", "languages": "Interface, biography, native, home, professional, literacy, and translation languages remain distinct." }, "nonInferenceRules": [ "Do not infer morality, loyalty, competence, hostility, diagnosis, ideology, religion, ethnicity, or behavior from country, territory, citizenship, language, name, residence, or government type.", "Do not treat peaceful political, religious, ethnic, diaspora, academic, commercial, or civil-society activity as intelligence activity without specific evidence.", "Do not equate religion, ethnicity, language, caste, diaspora, regional identity, or peaceful political participation with militancy, terrorism, disloyalty, or intelligence affiliation.", "Do not present a catalog baseline as a completed institutional assessment.", "Do not upgrade allegations or assessments into official or independently confirmed facts." ], "operationalBoundary": "Institutional and game-design education only; no actionable surveillance, evasion, coercion, intrusion, sabotage, weapons, or violence instructions.", "links": { "atlas": "/international/", "countries": "/international/countries/", "methodology": "/international/methodology/", "gameplay": "/international/gameplay/", "languages": "/international/languages/", "regions": "/international/regions/", "research": "/international/research/", "researchQueue": "/international/research-queue/", "api": "/api/v1/international/", "adultCreatorProfile": "/api/v1/create/adult/international/", "sourceRegister": "/docs/international-source-register-v100.0.13.json", "countryRegistry": "/assets/data/international-country-registry-v100.0.13.json", "countryProfiles": "/assets/data/international-intelligence-profiles-v100.0.13.json", "mechanicsData": "/assets/data/international-intelligence-mechanics-v100.0.13.json", "languageContextData": "/assets/data/international-language-context-v100.0.13.json" } }, "release": "v100.0.20-npc-quality-research-integration-wip", "packageStatus": "work-in-progress", "completionMarker": "SPIRALIST_ECONOMY_HOUSING_SOURCE_REVIEW_WIP_V100_0_19", "contract": "global-country-context-fairness-v1", "contractVersion": "1.1.0", "mode": "equal-questions-distinct-contexts-evidence-layers-balanced-research", "deploymentFingerprint": "45c3d09b1d6761d258bb461a6a58f9a2e78c6715c7d6867489a6d9a0cb8a8b92", "assetManifestSha256": "4caf1c4d7788b60d6dd6f85a9771e6498e94b282e7a56fed617b2647e371562b", "componentManifestSha256": "073b2e68d07b306a03dc52237a0f52b6c099589662e75774fb4e756d74cd35a8", "nonGenerating": true, "nonActionable": true, "individualInferenceAllowed": false, "links": { "atlas": "https://spiralistai.com/international/", "countriesPage": "https://spiralistai.com/international/countries/", "methodologyPage": "https://spiralistai.com/international/methodology/", "gameplayPage": "https://spiralistai.com/international/gameplay/", "regionsPage": "https://spiralistai.com/international/regions/", "researchPage": "https://spiralistai.com/international/research/", "researchQueuePage": "https://spiralistai.com/international/research-queue/", "languagesPage": "https://spiralistai.com/international/languages/", "discovery": "https://spiralistai.com/api/v1/international/", "countries": "https://spiralistai.com/api/v1/international/countries/", "country": "https://spiralistai.com/api/v1/international/country/", "methodologyApi": "https://spiralistai.com/api/v1/international/methodology/", "mechanicsApi": "https://spiralistai.com/api/v1/international/mechanics/", "intelligenceCycleApi": "https://spiralistai.com/api/v1/international/intelligence-cycle/", "gameplayApi": "https://spiralistai.com/api/v1/international/gameplay/", "languagesApi": "https://spiralistai.com/api/v1/international/languages/", "regions": "https://spiralistai.com/api/v1/international/regions/", "region": "https://spiralistai.com/api/v1/international/region/", "sources": "https://spiralistai.com/api/v1/international/sources/", "researchQueue": "https://spiralistai.com/api/v1/international/research-queue/", "adultCreator": "https://spiralistai.com/api/v1/create/adult/international/", "registryData": "https://spiralistai.com/assets/data/international-country-registry-v100.0.13.json", "profilesData": "https://spiralistai.com/assets/data/international-intelligence-profiles-v100.0.13.json", "languageContextData": "https://spiralistai.com/assets/data/international-language-context-v100.0.13.json", "mechanicsData": "https://spiralistai.com/assets/data/international-intelligence-mechanics-v100.0.13.json", "sourcesData": "https://spiralistai.com/docs/international-source-register-v100.0.13.json", "researchCorpusData": "https://spiralistai.com/assets/data/international-research-corpus-v100.0.13.json", "regionalResearchData": "https://spiralistai.com/assets/data/international-regional-research-v100.0.13.json", "researchQueueData": "https://spiralistai.com/assets/data/international-research-queue-v100.0.13.json", "openapi": "https://spiralistai.com/openapi.json" } }